REVALUATION IS NOT SO EASY:REFER 1998 CASE SUMMARY
Respondents-candidates for Gazetted Probationers 1998 Examination
approached KAT seeking revaluation of their compulsory Kannada/English
language papers – They also alleged that some successful candidates
indulged in examination malpractice in collusion with and connivance of
Examiners/officials of the Commission – KAT allowed the applications and
quashed the valuation
and directed fresh valuation of answer
scripts in all subjects – Aggrieved by the same the Commission and some
successful candidates filed these writ petitions before the High Court –
After examining the case in detail and in view of in-house enquiry
report of the Sub Committee of the Commission identifying the candidates
who indulged in examination malpractice and proposing to take action
against them, set aside the order of KAT directing fresh valuation and
upheld valuation in respect of 10 subjects (2 papers each) and directed
moderation/scaling in respect of 20 subjects (2 papers each).
Source : Facebook group
The case you have noted is different than the current one. I have read the whole judgment in detail and it available on KPSC web site as well. In the earlier case the aggrieved candidates have moved to the court but in the present case the government based on the investigation of CID has taken the decision. It is because, investigation has found the gross errors of evaluation in totality. Hence the whole procedure got culminated. In earlier case Hon. KAT took the same view as of now by govt.
ReplyDeleteHopefully the revaluation starts at the earliest and we may get relief. I myself is one of the victim of the wrong doings. I just can not imagine the way in which the paper are evaluated and marks have been given to us those who have sincerely prepared. If I am not exaggerating, at least in my case marks are 40% to 50% less than should get. eg. if some one expect 60% have got 40% out of 1800.
SK
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete